E-commerce and supply chains: The race to meet consumer demand in less than 24 hours

 Globalization, with its complex network of supply chains spanning continents, has been the primary driver of global economic growth for decades. The prevailing motto has been: "Make it where it's cheapest." But recent years, marked by successive shocks from the pandemic to the war in Ukraine and the maritime straits crisis, have exposed the fragility of this model. Today, we are witnessing a radical shift in the concepts of international trade, as companies and countries move from "pure efficiency" to "resilience and sustainability."

The concept of "nearshoring" is at the heart of trade discussions. This concept means relocating production facilities to locations geographically closer to target markets, rather than relying on suppliers in the other hemisphere. Companies that were entirely dependent on Asia for production have begun to seek alternatives in Latin America, Eastern Europe, or North Africa. This shift is not merely a geographical choice; it is a defensive strategy to mitigate risks. While the cost of ocean shipping has recently decreased, the risk of port disruptions or the closure of shipping lanes makes the "low" cost of long-distance shipping precarious.

Nevertheless, this shift has significant economic implications. The shift from production in China, with its massive infrastructure, cheap labor, and industrial conglomerate, to other countries means higher production costs (such as wages, energy, and less efficient logistics). These increased costs will inevitably be passed on to the end consumer, meaning the era of "very cheap goods" may be over. Economists predict that we are heading toward a "slower and more expensive globalization," but one that is also safer and more stable. This reality requires companies to restructure their financial business models to absorb these rising costs without losing competitiveness.

On the other hand, the concept of "friendship" or "allyship" is emerging as a political-trade strategy. Countries not only want to shorten distances but also want to ensure their trade is with their political allies. This trend is leading to the fragmentation of the global market into separate economic blocs with differing standards and protocols. This situation presents multinational corporations with the challenge of "dual compliance," as they may be forced to establish separate supply chains for different markets to avoid sanctions or trade tariffs.

At the logistics level, the increasing reliance on e-commerce has changed consumer expectations. Consumers are no longer content with waiting days; they expect same-day or next-day delivery. This reality is putting pressure on companies to invest heavily in automated warehouses, drones, and artificial intelligence technologies for inventory management. The supply chain is no longer simply about transporting goods from the factory to the store; it has become a complex network of real-time data aimed at predicting demand before it occurs.

The issue of energy also plays a pivotal role in trade decisions. The rise in energy costs in Europe following the Russian-Ukrainian crisis has prompted some energy-intensive industries to consider relocating their production to areas with cheaper or more reliable energy sources. This means that green energy policies and the drive to reduce carbon emissions will directly impact production locations. Companies adopting ESG (Environmental and Social Governance) principles seek to reduce the "carbon footprint" of their supplies, which means favoring local or regional products over those imported from distant locations.

Reshaping supply chains is a long and complex process that will not be completed overnight. This requires massive investments in infrastructure and a disruption of traditional trade links. For consumers, it means a wider variety of products, potentially of higher quality, tailored to local markets, but at higher prices. For policymakers, the challenge lies in providing a supportive environment, such as free trade zones and trade agreements, that encourages this strategic shift toward greater resilience and a lower likelihood of future shocks.

Post a Comment

Join the conversation

Join the conversation