.jpeg)
The global financial system has recently undergone profound transformations, most notably the decision by the BRICS group (comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) to expand its membership to include new and influential countries such as the UAE, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Saudi Arabia (which has applied for membership). This expansion is not merely a change in the number of members, but a powerful political and economic signal indicating the developing world's desire to redistribute power away from the traditional Western hegemony led by the United States and Europe.
A strategic analysis of this expansion reveals that BRICS aspires to become a genuine competitor to the G7. The demographic and economic power of the new group has become immense, encompassing rapidly growing economies that occupy strategic positions in the production of food, energy, and natural resources. One of the stated goals of this alliance is to reduce dependence on the US dollar in international trade. Western economic sanctions against Russia, and the "political" use of the dollar, have prompted many countries to seek alternative payment mechanisms using local currencies or to create a common currency for the group. If these efforts succeed, they could weaken the United States’ ability to impose sanctions and potentially dismantle the centralized financial system that emerged after World War II.
However, this bloc faces fundamental challenges that could hinder its effectiveness. First, there is significant economic and political disparity among its members. China is the world’s second-largest economy, while some of the newer members suffer from unstable economies or extreme poverty. Second, political rivalry (particularly between India and China) could undermine any attempt to forge a politically united front. Add to that the diverse political systems; BRICS includes both democracies and authoritarian regimes, making agreement on shared values regarding human rights and good governance extremely difficult. True success may lie only in the economic and trade spheres, not necessarily in a unified foreign policy.
In the energy sector, the inclusion of major oil producers like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates shifts the balance of power within the group. This gives BRICS considerable influence over global energy markets, potentially allowing it to influence oil and gas pricing decisions beyond the traditional influence of OPEC+. This also reduces the West’s ability to control oil flows during crises and increases the importance of the Gulf states as key players and power brokers between East and West.
From an investor’s perspective, an expanded BRICS represents a tremendous opportunity to invest in new emerging markets, but it comes with significant political and regulatory risks. The need to build infrastructure to connect these economies (railways, ports, and power grids) will create a huge opportunity for construction and technology companies, but who will benefit? Will it be Western companies or the Chinese companies that already have a head start?
The expansion of BRICS is evidence of a multipolar world in which new balances are rapidly taking shape. It is not necessarily a replacement for the Western system at present, but rather a parallel system that gives the developing world more room to maneuver. The real question economists are now watching is whether this alliance will be able to achieve genuine economic integration or remain merely a forum for dialogue and diplomacy opposed to the West.
.jpeg)